Accepted by ICML 2026

Demystifying Action Space Design for Robotic Manipulation Policies

Yuchun Feng*1, Jinliang Zheng*1,2, Zhihao Wang1,3, Dongxiu Liu1, Jianxiong Li1,
Jiangmiao Pang2, Tai Wang2, Xianyuan Zhan1

*Equal contribution · 1Institute for AI Industry Research, Tsinghua University · 2Shanghai AI Lab · 3Peking University

Motivation

Action Space Design Has Not Reached Consensus

Comparison showing that action space design has not reached consensus

Action space specification is a critical design choice in imitation-based robotic manipulation policy learning. The chosen action space fundamentally shapes the optimization landscape and learning dynamics of robotic policies.

Because action spaces are often selected using ad-hoc heuristics or legacy conventions, their role remains unclear. We conduct a large-scale empirical study and decompose action design along two key dimensions.

Action design space decomposition

Experiment Setup

A Systematic Testbed for Action Representation Choices

Experiment setup overview

Preliminary

Implementation Nuances Are Decisive

Delta action and horizon ablation results

Chunk-wise delta is fundamentally superior to step-wise delta.

Optimal horizons are critical and abstraction-dependent: delta requires shorter windows while absolute thrives with longer horizons.

Overall Takeaways

Delta, Joint-Space, and Task-Space Strengths Depend on Regime

Main comparison table of action representations

The superiority of delta actions remains consistent across diverse learning regimes.

Joint-space actions benefit exceptionally from stronger modeling capacity and extensive training.

Task-space representations show a pronounced advantage in generalized settings such as cross embodiment and transfer learning.

Scaling Experiments

Modern Backbones Amplify Representation Effects

Delta actions serve as a superior temporal abstraction for modern policy backbones.

Joint-space control generally provides a robust spatial representation, particularly when paired with strong generative modeling.

Scaling experiment results

Sample Rollout Videos

Bimanual Bowl · Abs-EE
Bimanual Bowl · Abs-Joint
Bimanual Bowl · Delta-EE
Bimanual Bowl · Delta-Joint

Spatial Variation

Performance Uniformity Across Workspace Locations

Spatial variation in performance across workspace bins

We partition the workspace into a 6x6 grid and evaluate each policy across spatial bins. For each action representation, we compute success rate within each cell and summarize spatial heterogeneity by the standard deviation of per-cell success rates. Lower values indicate more uniform performance across the workspace.

RoboTwin

Scaling Experiments on RoboTwin

Sample Rollout Videos

Dump Bin BigBin · Abs-EE
Dump Bin BigBin · Abs-Joint
Dump Bin BigBin · Delta-EE
Dump Bin BigBin · Delta-Joint
Place Burger Fries · Abs-EE
Place Burger Fries · Abs-Joint
Place Burger Fries · Delta-EE
Place Burger Fries · Delta-Joint

Cloth Folding

Advanced VLA Experiments for Deformable Object Manipulation

We introduce advanced experiments on cloth folding as a representative deformable object manipulation task. The VLA model uses a VLM+DiT backbone and two evaluation protocols designed to stress-test adaptability.

Cloth folding VLA result summary